Valley National Bank v. A.E. Rouse & Co.

Good Law
121 F.3d 1332·97 Daily Journal DAR 10396·1997 WL 450668·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21136·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6374
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 1997No. 96-15993California2,750 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Farris, J.

The Valley National Bank of Arizona obtained a default judgment in Arizona state court against the Varga Group, an Arizona general partnership. The Bank brought this suit to enforce its judgment against two general partners in the Varga Group, A.E. Rouse & Company and B.M. Rouse & Company, both Wyoming partnerships, and those partnerships’ general partners. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The Bank appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I.

BACKGROUND

In 1985, the Varga Group, an Arizona general partnership comprised of Charles P. Varga, Schwan Properties, A.E. Rouse & Company and B.M. Rouse & Company, approached Valley National Bank to obtain financing for a real estate purchase. The Bank loaned the Varga Group 11.5 million dollars. The loan was secured by a deed of trust, and Charles Varga, A.E. Rouse, B.M. Rouse, Joseph Schwan and Catherine Schwan each personally guaranteed the loan.

In 1987, the Varga Group and the guarantors defaulted on the loan. The Bank sued the Group and the guarantors to foreclose the deed of trust and for the remaining deficiency. The complaint did not name A.E. Rouse & Company or B.M.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.