UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Joseph LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
67 F.3d 225·95 Daily Journal DAR 12998·1995 WL 569644·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27564·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7583
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 199594-30214California5,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

Larry Joseph Lewis appeals his jury conviction on twelve counts of bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 and two counts of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . This appeal requires us to resolve a statutory construction issue of first impression — whether a state chartered, non-federally insured branch of a foreign bank is subject to the bank fraud statute. We also consider Lewis’ challenge to jury instructions defining “intent to defraud” under the bank and wire fraud statutes. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse.

I.

In August, 1984 twenty-seven-year-old Larry Lewis became manager of the Portland, Oregon branch of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank (“HKSB”), a title he would hold until his resignation in June, 1988. Lewis, whose previous position at HKSB was limited to supervising tellers and assisting in import/export loans, had no prior experience in granting loans or in managing a bank. With his promotion came the weighty task of improving the revenues of the singularly unprofitable Portland branch.

Shortly after becoming branch manager, Lewis made a large authorized loan to Financial Reserve Group (“FRG”)- He soon learned that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.