Gilham

Montana v. Gilham

Good Law
127 F.3d 897·97 Daily Journal DAR 13152·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 28880·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8139
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 1997No. 96-35766California4,171 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

This appeal raises the question of whether the State of Montana may be subject to an unconsented tort action filed by an individual plaintiff in Blackfeet Tribal Court. We hold that Montana’s sovereign immunity bars such' an action.

I

Our consideration of these questions of dominion and authority has its genesis in a personal tragedy. On January 14, 1986, Christine Gilham was fatally injured when the car in which she was a passenger struck a permanently anchored highway sign at the intersection of U.S. Highways 2 and 89 within the external boundaries of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, located in the State of Montana. Toni Gilham (“Gilham”), Christine’s mother, brought an action against the driver of the car, who was intoxicated at the time of the accident, and the State of Montana (“Montana”) in the Blackfeet Tribal Court. She alleged that Montana was negligent in its design, construction, and maintenance of the intersection.

*899 Montana filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that as a sovereign it is immune from suit in the Blackfeet Tribal Court absent a waiver of its sovereign immunity. The tribal court denied the motion, and the case proceeded to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.