Anderson

Anderson v. United States

Good Law
127 F.3d 1190·97 Daily Journal DAR 13645·1997 WL 680066·72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,227·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30270
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 1997No. 96-35768California483 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

OVERVIEW

Plaintiffs Traci Anderson and Cynthia Irons filed an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (1994), alleging the government was liable for, inter alia, negligent supervision and sexual harassment based on a Washington state civil rights statute. Wash. Rev.Code (RCW) § 49.60.030 (Supp.1996-1997). The court entered a judgment awarding compensatory damages. It issued a separate award covering attorneys’ fees and expenses. The district court reasoned that because the state statute authorizes an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses against private parties, the government should likewise be liable for such fees and expenses. This court reverses and remands to vacate judgment only to the extent that it grants an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses against the United States.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

This court reviews de novo the issue of sovereign immunity for the purposes of recovering attorneys’ fees under the FTCA. E.J. Friedman Co. v. United States, 6 F.3d 1355, 1357 (9th Cir.1993).

DISCUSSION

The FTCA does not contain an express waiver of sovereign immunity for attorneys’ fees and expenses. We adopt the reasoning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.