Tierney

Tierney v. Kupers

Caution
128 F.3d 1310·97 Daily Journal DAR 13531·1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29895·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8390
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 1997Nos. 97-35200, 97-35201California836 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nelson, J.

A 1996 amendment to 28 U.S.C.' § 1915 limited the ability of prisoners, if they had filed three previous actions dismissed as frivolous, to proceed informa pauperis in order to avoid paying filing fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g). Washington state prisoner Michael Tierney appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal, pursuant to that section, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because we conclude that the § 1915(g) calculation includes claims dismissed prior to the effective date of the statute, we affirm.

I.

Effective April 26, 1996, Congress enacted the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). Pub.L. No. 104-134, § 804 (g), 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). In part, the PLRA amended the portion of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 which deals with “proceedings in forma pauperis.” Specifically, the new law prohibited prisoners from bringing a civil action or appeal in forma pauperis

28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g).

On November 5, 1996, Tierney, a prisoner, filed two actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , both of which were accompanied by applications to proceed in forma pauperis. Prior to filing his present § 1983 actions, Tierney filed six other actions, while incarcerated in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.