Harish K. Bharti and Anoop Bharti, Husband and Wife v. King County Bruce Knutson Jane Doe Knutson Pat Nixon Gary Tomlinson

67 F.3d 305 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harish K. BHARTI and Anoop Bharti, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KING COUNTY; Bruce Knutson; Jane Doe Knutson; Pat Nixon; Gary Tomlinson; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35599. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. * Decided Sept. 26, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Harish Bharti ("Bharti") appeals from the district court's issuance of a protective order and grant of summary judgment in favor of King County and various officials of its Superior Court ("King County"). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. I. 4 Bharti served the King County Superior Court as a volunteer Court Appointed Special Advocate ("CASA") and as a member of the Conference Committee Diversion Program from 1987 until June 19, 1989. On October 27, 1993, Bharti filed an action in…