Boyang, Ltd. And Hee-Sung Jang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

67 F.3d 305 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BOYANG, LTD. and Hee-Sung Jang, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35535. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Decided Sept. 29, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON, CANBY, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD, * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Boyang Ltd. and Hee-Sung Jang (collectively "Boyang") appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). The district court affirmed the denial of Boyang's application to extend Jang's nonimmigrant status as an intracompany transferee, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101 (a)(15)(L) (1988 ed. Supp.V). 1 Boyang contends that the Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU) of the INS erred in ruling that Boyang's branch office was not doing business in the United States and that Jang was not acting primarily in a managerial…