Michael M. Blas Thomas L. Chambers William Dickerson Ruben L. Encinas v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Ruel Cobb

67 F.3d 305 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael M. BLAS; Thomas L. Chambers; William Dickerson; Ruben L. Encinas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; Ruel Cobb, Defendants-Appellees. No. CA 94-55856. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1995. Decided Sept. 21, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** I. 3 Michael Blas and his co-plaintiffs appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment to United Parcel Service (UPS) in this Title VII race discrimination claim. We affirm. II. 4 The parties are aware of the facts and we will not repeat them here. 5 Plaintiffs first argue that they raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether they engaged in the misconduct that formed the basis for their terminations. Thus, they argue that the district court erred in granting UPS summary judgment. See Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421,…