Everett v. Lozano
Opinion
Opinion
67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald EVERETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. LOZANO, officially and individual capacity as ranking Lieutenant; T.L. Hill, officially and individual capacity as ranking Lieutenant; E. Contreras, officially and in individual capacity as Program Administrator; T. March, officially and in individual capacity as Program Administrator; San Diego County Sheriff's Department; Does, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56333. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Everett, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motions for appointment of counsel and for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 3 The district court's order denying Everett's request for appointment of counsel is not a…