Ambrus Fodor v. Immigration & Naturalization Service Richard C. Smith, District Director, Ins Western District at Seattle

67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ambrus FODOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Richard C. Smith, District Director, INS Western District at Seattle, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-36213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ambrus Fodor, a native and citizen of Canada, appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus contesting a final order of exclusion. The district court affirmed the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") finding him excludable under 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1182 (a)(7)(i)(I) and 1182(a)(6)(C). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 and 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(b). We affirm. 3 Fodor concedes excludability under section 1182(a)(7)(i)(I), but contends that the district court erred by finding that substantial…