Alvaro Arturo Gonzalez-Chavarria v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
67 F.3d 306·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32739
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 199594-70692California507 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alvaro Arturo GONZALEZ-CHAVARRIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70692. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1995. * Decided Oct. 3, 1995. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alvaro Arturo Gonzalez-Chavarria ("Gonzalez-Chavarria"), a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge's decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a); see Padilla-Agustin v. INS, 21 F.3d 970, 973 (9th Cir.1994). We grant the petition for review. 3 The BIA summarily dismissed Gonzalez-Chavarria's appeal because his notice of appeal (Form EOIR-26) failed to list the reasons for appeal with sufficient specificity and because he failed to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.