Martha Rean Dill v. Lockheed Corporation

67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martha Rean DILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55483. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 29, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martha Rean Dill appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her complaint against Lockheed Corporation for Dill's failure to timely serve a summons and complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(h). Dill seeks damages arising when Lockheed allegedly used her body against her will to control the weather. 3 Dill does not dispute that she failed to properly serve Lockheed pursuant to California law, which requires service of process on a corporation to be made on an officer of the corporation or the authorized agent for service of process. Cal.Civ.Proc.Code Sec. 416.10. Dill contends that the Deputy Sheriff refused to reserve the complaint and…