Everts v. Cochran

Good Law
67 F.3d 306·1995 WL 563611·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32748
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 199594-36134California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick W. EVERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John COCHRAN, PhD, individually and in his official capacity as program consultant for the Probationary Sex Offender Treatment Program at the Oregon State Hospital; Richard Yates, individually and in his official capacity as therapy supervisor for the Probationary Sex Offender Treatment Program at the Oregon State Hospital; Stanley F. Mazur-Hart, PhD, individually and in his official capacity as superintendant of the Oregon State Hospital; Stacey Heyworth, individually and in her official capacity as deputy district attorney for the County of Multnomah, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-36134. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 22, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick W. Everts, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.