Christopher v. Gomez
Opinion
Opinion
67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael A. CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director, California Department of Corrections; L. Snider, Warden, California Correctional Institute; Alipaz, Correctional Officer; Saladna, Correctional Officer; Howard, Correctional Officer; Sneed, Correctional Officer; Gamboa, Correctional Officer; Gatti, Correctional Officer; Yoder, Correctional Officer; Gonzalez, Correctional Officer Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael A. Christopher, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment on the pleadings in favor of James Gomez, the Director of the California Department of Corrections, L. Snider, the Warden of the California Correctional Institute ("CCI"), and eight correctional officers at CCI in…