Christopher v. Gomez

Good Law
67 F.3d 306·1995 WL 566050·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32736
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199594-17175California1,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 306 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael A. CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director, California Department of Corrections; L. Snider, Warden, California Correctional Institute; Alipaz, Correctional Officer; Saladna, Correctional Officer; Howard, Correctional Officer; Sneed, Correctional Officer; Gamboa, Correctional Officer; Gatti, Correctional Officer; Yoder, Correctional Officer; Gonzalez, Correctional Officer Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael A. Christopher, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment on the pleadings in favor of James Gomez, the Director of the California Department of Corrections, L. Snider, the Warden of the California Correctional Institute ("CCI"), and eight correctional officers at CCI in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.