Kenney v. Stark

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James KENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles D. STARK; Jeanne Buckley; Arnold Rosenfield; Elaine Watters; Rex Sater; Raymond Giordano; John Gallagher; Sonoma County Superior Court; Lloyd Von Der Mehden; Office of Education, County of Mendocino; Robert Marmor; Donna Kenney; James Climo, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 27, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James P. Kenney appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his civil rights action which he brought under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985, and 1986 against Charles D. Stark, Donna Kenney, James Climo, Robert Marmor, the Mendocino County Office of Education 1 , the Sonoma County Superior Court, and seven superior court judges (collectively the "defendants"). Kenney alleged that the defendants…