Lewis v. US West Communications, Inc.

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger LEWIS and Patricia Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a Colorado corporation; Richard H. Deutsche, an Individual, and John Doe Nos. I through X, Individuals, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35695. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Decided Sept. 28, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD, * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Roger and Patricia Lewis ("Lewis") 1 appeal from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Lewis' former employer, U.S. West Communications, Inc. ("U.S. West") and partial summary judgment in favor of U.S. West employee, Richard H. Deutsche ("Deutsche") in Lewis' action for damages on various state law claims. Lewis contends that reversal is compelled because: (1) the district court erred in finding that Idaho's statute of limitations barred Lewis' tort claims to the extent…