Kimble v. Bunnell

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert William KIMBLE, Sr.; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William BUNNELL, Warden of Tehachapi; James Gomez, Director of Corrections; G. Curtis, Correctional Officer; Alipaz, Correctional Officer; Sneed, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17206. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 5, 1995. * Decided Sept. 20, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert W. Kimble, Sr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants 1 on his Eighth Amendment claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 3 A. Deliberate Indifference to Medical Needs and Excessive Force 4 Kimble contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment on his claim that prison officials were…