Patricia Junot v. Maricopa County

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Patricia JUNOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15712. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1994. Submission Vacated Dec. 27, 1994. Resubmitted Sept. 26, 1994. Decided Oct. 2, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of Arizona, No. CV-88-00250-RCB; Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding. Before: SCHROEDER, FERGUSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Patricia Junot appeals from the district court's judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Maricopa County ("County"), and the court's denial of her post-trial motion for a new trial. Junot's action alleged that the County discriminated against her, in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794 , when it rejected her application for employment as a detention officer cadet in the Maricopa County Sheriff's Department because…