Nelson v. Harris

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark S. NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neil HARRIS, Clair Morris, Leonard Herrera, Ronald Dickenson, Colleen Cunningham, Kenya Castillo, Mike Otterstrom, Shirley Williams, Stacey Faulkner, Martin Henneberry, and S.J. Smith, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15614. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 22, 1995. * Decided Sept. 28, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * Mark Nelson, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Nelson argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment: (1) in favor of the Elko County Sheriff and various employees of the Sheriff's Department ("County Defendants") on his claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs; (2) in favor of S.J. Smith, M.D. ("Dr. Smith") on his claim of deliberate…