Harvey v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Sav. Ass'n

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George M. HARVEY, a/k/a George, a/k/a Harvey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION; Superior Court of the State of California; Eugene Bishop; Rodney L. Soda & Associates, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56478. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 27, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Harvey appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that Judge Eugene Bishop, the Superior Court of the State of California ("Superior Court"), James Hollins, Ima Faye Hollins, Rodney L. Soda, and Bank of America, N.T. & S.A. ("BOA") violated Harvey's civil rights when they executed a judgment and caused a levy on Harvey's BOA checking account on the Hollins's behalf. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm.…