Milbourn v. Marriott

Good Law
67 F.3d 307·1995 WL 555722·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32778
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 199594-35142California2,354 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard MILBOURN, Legal Guardian for Rachel Leona MILBOURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Everett M. MARRIOTT, Jacqueline L. Marriott, Eldon Ekelin; Patricia Kluge, formerly Patricia Ekelin, individually and as partners in the partnership of Marriott & Kluge, and the partnership of Marriott and Kluge, dba Coin Laundry, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1995. Decided Sept. 15, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE, * District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Rachel Leona Milbourn, through her legal guardian, Richard Milbourn, appeals from the district court judgment in favor of defendants following a trial by jury. Appellant challenges the district court's rulings in connection with evidence that was accidentally destroyed. We affirm. BACKGROUND 4 Appellant is a small child who was injured when a table in defendants' laundry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.