Jenks v. Hull

Good Law
67 F.3d 307·1995 WL 574518·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 199594-15268California3,647 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael L. JENKS, Debra Jenks, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for Gene Donald Smith, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louise HULL, Diana Murdoch and Fran Clark, individually and as Social workers of Contra Costa County Child Protective Services; Child Protective SVC, Contra Costa County Child Protective Services; James A. Rydingsword; City of Concord, Concord Police Department; Perfecto Villarreal, Officer; Larry Lee, Officer of the Concord Police Dept; Contra Costa County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15268. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1995. Decided Sept. 28, 1995. Before: CHOY, BEEZER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Michael and Debra Jenks (collectively the "Jenkses"), individually and as guardians ad litem for their minor son, Gene Donald Smith ("Donny"), appeal the district court's summary judgment orders, dated April 7, 1993 and November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.