Edwin Donald Nurinda-Vado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

67 F.3d 307 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edwin Donald NURINDA-VADO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70019. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 29, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edwin Donald Nurinda-Vado, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' affirmance of an immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we affirm. 3 The BIA did not violate Nurinda-Vado's due process rights by taking administrative notice of the change of government in Nicaragua because he had the opportunity to address the change of government at his deportation hearing before the IJ and on appeal before the BIA. See Acewicz v. INS, 984 F.2d 1056, 1061 (9th Cir.1993). 4 The BIA…