Rountree v. King County

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tom ROUNTREE; Debbie Albiso; Mel Andriesen; George Bray; James Camlin; Bob Gaunt; Montie Hamilton; Melinda (Jenson) Rees; Walt Kinney; Vearl Ledbetter; John Loutsis; John Maddock; Germaine Malgarini; Robert McManus; Allen Mitchell; Joyce St. Germaine-Mitchell; Bob Nonas; Rick Shepardson; Gayle Starr; Denton Thorbeck; Bob Toppen; Jon Wagar; Ralph Wattles; Charles Wildman; Art Wilson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35152. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Resubmitted Oct. 3, 1995. Decided Oct. 4, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The appellants, employed as supervisors with the King County Department of Public Works, appeal the summary judgment order in favor of King County in their action seeking overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 . 3 The appellants…