Daniel Quackenbush v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Health & Human Services

Good Law
67 F.3d 308·1995 WL 566924·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33000
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199594-56236California882 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel QUACKENBUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-56236. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Quackenbush appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("Secretary") affirming the Secretary's decision denying Quackenbush's claims for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits, pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405 . Quackenbush alleged disability due to a back injury. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. See Drouin v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 1255, 1257 (9th Cir.1992). We will uphold the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.