John Sheehan v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., a Connecticut Corporation Joanna Turner, an Individual

Good Law
67 F.3d 308·1995 WL 563773·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33004
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 199594-15222California2,749 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., a Connecticut corporation; Joanna Turner, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Decided Sept. 22, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 3 John Sheehan appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of Aetna Casualty & Surety (Aetna) and Joanna Turner, an Aetna employee, in his action alleging age and handicap discrimination, in violation of Arizona Revised Statute Sec. 41-1463, breach of contract, interference with contractual relationships, and wrongful discharge. 1 He contends the district court abused its discretion when it refused to consider a supplemental affidavit which he filed in support of his response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. He also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.