In Re Alfred Bert Robbs, Jr., Debtor. Alfred Bert Robbs, Jr., an Individual v. Hughes, Hubbard & Reed William T. Bisset Rita M. Haeusler

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Alfred Bert ROBBS, Jr., Debtor. Alfred Bert ROBBS, Jr., an individual, Appellant, v. HUGHES, HUBBARD & REED; William T. Bisset; Rita M. Haeusler, Appellees. No. 93-55099. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1994. Decided Sept. 12, 1995. Before: BROWNING, FERGUSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The dismissal of the underlying bankruptcy case rendered this appeal moot. See Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477-78 (1990). 3 The order from which appeal was taken allowed HHR's claim for attorneys' fees over Robbs's challenge thereto based upon allegations of malpractice. (See E.R. 12, 30, 110, 112.5, 307.) The order did not award HHR a money judgment for the amount of its fees or determine Robbs's claims of malpractice, which were then pending in a separate proceeding in the district court. 1 (See Robbs Brief 4; HHR Brief 4.) 4 The…