Dolores Raya v. Maryatt Industries Corporation Gregory Cornell

Good Law
67 F.3d 308·1995 WL 567622·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32997
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 199594-15077California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dolores RAYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYATT INDUSTRIES CORPORATION; Gregory Cornell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15077. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 17, 1995. * Decided Sept. 26, 1995. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Dolores Raya appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for Maryatt Industries Corporation ("Maryatt") in her wrongful discharge action against Maryatt. 4 The district court found that Raya presented insufficient medical evidence of a physical handicap within the meaning of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to support her handicap discrimination claim. With regard to Raya's retaliatory discharge claim, the district court found that Raya failed to state a claim under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 158 ; Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000 (e), et. seq.;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.