Paperplains, Inc. Steve Rose Paula Sharkey v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company Centennial Insurance Company

Good Law
67 F.3d 308·1995 WL 574650·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 199594-55273California1,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PAPERPLAINS, INC.; Steve Rose; Paula Sharkey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; Centennial Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55273. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 8, 1995. Decided Sept. 28, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Paperplains, Inc. and two of its supervisory employees appeal summary judgment in favor of Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. 1 The district court held that the plaintiffs' claims in the underlying action for sex discrimination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent supervision and loss of consortium arising out of Mrs. Graham's harassment by a Paperplains customer were either willful acts in violation of public policy and therefore excluded from coverage under Cal.Ins.Code Sec. 533, or were negligent acts for which the recovery of damages is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.