Pierro v. County of Sacramento

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jefferlene PIERRO; Alfred L. Pierro, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Lee B. Elam; Douglas Fraleigh; Warren H. Harada; Donald L. Schultze; Gene Bergst; Vernon Von Ferber; W.J. Smith; West Coast Building Wrecking, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16527. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Property owners Jefferlene and Alfred Pierro sued the County of Sacramento, certain county employees, and a wrecking company (collectively "County"), alleging that their federal and state constitutional rights were violated when the County condemned and demolished their building in Sacramento as a public nuisance. The Pierros asserted civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985(3), and 1986, violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act…