Ronald Sneed v. L.R. Ricks R. Foote Lt. D. Hamilton B. Hill R. Piazza M. Pope R. Zarate C. Barto S. Huerta Does 1-10

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald SNEED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L.R. RICKS; R. Foote; Lt. D. Hamilton; B. Hill; R. Piazza; M. Pope; R. Zarate; C. Barto; S. Huerta; Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55089. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 29, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Ronald Sneed, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Specifically, Sneed contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants on his claim that they denied him procedural due process as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We vacate and remand. We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992). "District courts…