John Davis Paseur v. California Department of Corrections D. Fiddler M. Hodges E. Contaras M. Tichner J. Ratelle J. Rowland

67 F.3d 308 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Davis PASEUR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; D. Fiddler; M. Hodges; E. Contaras; M. Tichner; J. Ratelle; J. Rowland, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-56247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Davis Paseur, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his amended complaint for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . We dismiss Paseur's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 In a civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed "within thirty days after the date of entry of the judgment or order appealed from." Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). An inmate's notice of appeal is deemed "filed" when it is deposited in the prison's mail system. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1) & 4(c). The requirement for timely notice of…