United States v. Philip Charles Kellotat

67 F.3d 309 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip Charles KELLOTAT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30249. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1995. Decided Sept. 25, 1995. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HUG, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Following a jury trial at which he represented himself, Philip Charles Kellotat ("Kellotat") was convicted on five counts of possession, manufacture, and distribution of methamphetamine, possession of ephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and conspiracy to possess, manufacture, and distribute methamphetamine. Through his appointed counsel, Kellotat appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds and denying his motion to suppress evidence. He also challenges the sentence imposed, claiming that the district court erred in…