United States v. Rigoberto Garcia-Solorzano and Senel Ramos-Toros

67 F.3d 309 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rigoberto GARCIA-SOLORZANO and Senel Ramos-Toros, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-30447, 94-30448. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1995. Decided Sept. 28, 1995. Before: WRIGHT, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Senel Ramos-Toro (Ramos) and Rigoberto Garcia-Solarzano (Garcia) appeal from their judgment of conviction. Ramos and Garcia seek reversal on the ground that the district court erred in denying their motion to suppress evidence found in their luggage as the fruit of an unlawful seizure. Ramos and Garcia further contend that the district court erred in denying their motion to suppress because their consent to search was coerced. 3 Garcia separately argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress all the statements he made to Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agents, including his…