United States v. Greg Anthony Kincaid

67 F.3d 309 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Greg Anthony KINCAID, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 22, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Greg Anthony Kincaid appeals his jury conviction and 27-month sentence for two counts of interstate communication of threats to injure another person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 875 (c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Kincaid's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Kincaid filed a pro se brief claiming that the evidence was insufficient to convict him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 Because Kincaid moved for a judgment of acquittal under Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(a) to Count One of the indictment,…