United States v. Edith H. Dahle

67 F.3d 309 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edith H. DAHLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. Decided Sept. 29, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant-Appellant, Edith Dahle, is a citizen of Germany. In August of 1992, she was convicted in the District Court for the District of Oregon for making false declarations to the court and was sentenced to six months home detention and three years probation. In 1994, she admitted to various probation violations, and was sentenced to six months imprisonment and three years supervised release. She has now served the period of incarceration and has been deported. She appeals her sentence on two grounds. 3 First, she contends that the district court, in imposing the six-month prison sentence, was under the misapprehension that it had…