The William H. Morris Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Group W. Inc. Jerry Wilson, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. The William H. Morris Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Cross-Appellee v. Group W. Inc. Jerry Wilson, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Cross-Appellants

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The WILLIAM H. MORRIS CO., Plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant, v. GROUP W. INC.; Jerry Wilson, Defendants-counter-claimants-appellees. The WILLIAM H. MORRIS CO., Plaintiff-counter-defendant-cross-appellee, v. GROUP W. INC.; Jerry Wilson, Defendants-counter-claimants-cross-appellants. Nos. 94-55365, 94-55453. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1995. Decided Sept. 27, 1995. Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * , ** I. Amount of Damage 2 Group W failed to meet its burden of providing a "reasonable basis" for the computation of the amount of damage resulting solely from the October 23 letter because the damage estimates were premised both on the October 23 letter and Omicron conspiring to drive Group W's distributor, Shannon Supply, out of business, an allegation rejected by the district court. 1 See Lindy Pen Co. v. Bic Pen Corp., 982 F.2d…