United States v. R.G. Reynolds

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. R.G. REYNOLDS, Defendants-Appellant. Nos. 94-50390, 94-50522. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. * Decided Sept. 27, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 In these consolidated appeals, R.G. Reynolds appeals the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration and motion for return of property pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). Reynolds contends that the district court erred in correcting the restitution element of his sentence and permitting the sale of his property to satisfy the restitution order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. BACKGROUND 4 Reynolds was convicted, following a jury trial, of thirteen counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 and two counts of witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec.…