United States v. Sergio Montoya

Good Law
67 F.3d 310·1995 WL 565993·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33050
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199594-16803California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-16803. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sergio Montoya appeals the district court's denial of his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . Montoya contends that it is unclear from the record whether the district court used its discretion when it denied his motion for a downward departure. He also renews the claim rejected on direct appeal that he was sentenced on the basis of unreliable information, and should have received an evidentiary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's denial of a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . Grady v. United States, 929 F.2d 468, 470 (9th Cir.1991). 4 We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.