United States v. Anthony Scott

Good Law
67 F.3d 310·1995 WL 566069·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 33072
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 199594-30460California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30460. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Scott appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, United States v. Gallegos-Gonzalez, 3 F.3d 325, 328 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm. 3 Scott challenges his designation as a career offender. He contends that the district court erred by treating his prior convictions for controlled substance possessions as unrelated under U.S.S.G. Secs. 4A1.2 and 4B1.1. The district court properly determined that his prior convictions were unrelated because the offenses were separated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.