United States v. Michael A. McLoone
Opinion
Opinion
67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. McLOONE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30319. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 20, 1995. * Decided Sept. 28, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael McLoone appeals his conviction imposed following a jury trial for the crimes of: (1) pledging a stolen firearm as security for a loan; (2) receiving, concealing, and storing a stolen firearm; and (3) selling a stolen firearm, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (j). McLoone contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. McLoone argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him because the government failed to prove that the firearm was stolen. We affirm the district court's judgment. 3 We review a district court's denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal under the same standard applied to…