United States v. James Norman, Jr.

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James NORMAN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 11, 1995. * Decided Sept. 20, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and QUACKENBUSH, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 James Norman, Jr. appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to one count of assault. We have jurisdiction over Norman's appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 4 Norman and four friends, all San Carlos Apache Indians and all but one under the age of eighteen at the time, assaulted another San Carlos Apache so severely that he required surgery on his face and permanently suffers from a droopy eye. Norman pleaded guilty after the district court ruled on a number of pretrial motions. In this court Norman raises four claims of error; we discuss each in turn. 1. Disclosure of the Presentence…