Wayne v. State of Or.

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ted L. WAYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon; Rodney W. Miller; Duane R. Ertsgaard; Marion County; Polk County; John D. Ostrander; Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission; Mitchell, Rodrigues & Sears; Tooze, Shenker, Duden, Creamer, Frank & Hutchison; Robert C. Cannon; Michael J. Hanson; Robert Prinslow; Greg Hansen, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-36170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ted L. Wayne appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. The district court dismissed: (1) the State of Oregon as barred by the Eleventh Amendment; (2) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") as barred by sovereign immunity; and (3) the remaining defendants for failure to comply with a district court order. We have…