Zenaida Walters v. "A" Company, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson Company Cheryl E. Loving and Does 1 Through 30, Inclusive

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Zenaida WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. "A" COMPANY, INC., a Johnson & Johnson Company; Cheryl E. Loving; and Does 1 Through 30, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55452. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. Decided Sept. 28, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, and BOGGS, * Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant, Zenaida Walters, filed common law claims and a statutory claim pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), Cal.Gov't Code Secs. 12920-12996, in California Superior Court, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for wrongful termination from her employment with Appellee, "A" Company ("Company"), based on discrimination because of a work-related physical disability. Company removed the case to federal court, and the district court accepted removal jurisdiction based on federal law preemption of an artfully pleaded state…