United States v. Louis Sogoian

67 F.3d 310 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis SOGOIAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-16624. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis Sogoian appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and we affirm. 3 Sogoian contends that the district court improperly rejected the following claims: (1) the government failed to disclose exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1983); (2) the court relied on contested information in determining his sentence; and (3) he was denied his constitutional rights to have witnesses testify on his behalf at trial and to confront and cross-examine government witnesses. 4 The district court properly dismissed Sogoian's first…