Paul A. Wright v. Howard Anderson Kenneth Ducharme James Evans, and Veronica Rebiero

67 F.3d 311 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard ANDERSON; Kenneth Ducharme; James Evans, Defendants-Appellants, and Veronica Rebiero, Defendant. No. 95-35069. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. * Decided Sept. 29, 1995. Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Superintendent of the Washington State Reformatory Kenneth DuCharme, Correctional Unit Supervisor Howard Anderson, and Correctional Unit Supervisor James Evans appeal the district court's orders denying their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and denying their motion for reconsideration, in inmate Paul Wright's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Wright asserts that the defendants violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by placing him in segregation and transferring him to the Washington State Penitentiary in retaliation for speaking out at an…