Paul A. Wright v. Neal Brown, Superintendent Bob Shaw, Assoc. Superintendent Mark Crewson Abe Clark Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent

67 F.3d 311 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul A. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Neal BROWN, Superintendent; Bob Shaw, Assoc. Superintendent; Mark Crewson; Abe Clark; Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35486. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1995. * Decided Sept. 25, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and TEVRIZIAN, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Paul Wright appeals a summary judgment grant in favor of all defendants in a civil rights suit brought by Wright under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985 and 1986. Defendant Clark, the mailroom sergeant at the prison where Wright is located, misinterpreted a statement in a policy manual--that incoming mail "should" include the prisoners' Department of Corrections identification number ("DOC number") in the address--to mean that the DOC numbers were mandatory. See DOC Policy 450.020(4)(a). Wright's claims arise out of the…