Meltzer

Johnson v. Meltzer

Good Law
134 F.3d 1393·98 Daily Journal DAR 909·1998 WL 27232·1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1040·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 684
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 1998No. 95-56404California2,635 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Charles Johnson appeals the summary judgment that terminated his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against all defendants for the administration of an experimental drug without his consent. Because he raised issues of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment against all defendants except P.G. Herrera, we reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural Background

Johnson is a California state prisoner. While driving a stolen car the wrong way on a freeway in an attempt to evade arrest, he crashed into another ear and killed the driver. Suffering severe head injuries of his own, he was taken to UCSD where he was initially seen by Dr. James Davis, the trauma attending physician. Someone administered a paralytic agent to immobilize him; he was intubated and hyperventilated in an effort to prevent brain damage from elevated intra-cranial pressure.

About two hours after Johnson’s arrival at the hospital, Doctors Meltzer and Marshall— both neurosurgeons — became involved in Johnson’s care. They performed an operation to insert an instrument into Johnson’s skull to monitor intracranial pressure. They apparently completed this procedure somewhere between 7:10 a.m and 7:20 a.m. Then, at 8:30…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.