Auvil v. CBS 60 Minutes

Good Law
67 F.3d 816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 2, 199593-35963California3,762 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 816 23 Media L. Rep. 2454 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7691 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13 ,163 Grady AUVIL and Lillie Auvil, husband and wife; Robert Bernath and Cathy Bernath, husband and wife; Robert Brody and Charlotte Brody, husband and wife; Burt Chestnut and Elly Chestnut, husband and wife; Harold Cox and Lorraine Cox, husband and wife; Ferrell Deen and Peggy Deen, husband and wife; Charles Drake and Maxine Drake, d/b/a Frosty Red Orchard, Inc., husband and wife; James Eddie, d/b/a Eddie Farms, Inc.; Paul Hudson, a marriedman on behalf of his separate property; Bert Stennes and Evelyn Stennes, husband and wife, d/b/a Squaw Creek Ranch, Inc.; Norman Wilson and Wanda Wilson, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CBS "60 MINUTES", a foreign corporation; Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS), a foreign corporation; Retlaw Enterprises, Inc., a corporation, d/b/a KIMA Television; Bonneville International Corporation, a corporation, d/b/a Kiro Television; King Broadcasting Company, a corporation, d/b/a KREM Television, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35963. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1994. Decided Oct. 2, 1995. Scott A. Jonsson,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.