Albers

United States v. Albers

Good Law
136 F.3d 670·1998 WL 61340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 1998No. 96-10561California1,756 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kozinski, J.

National Park Service rangers discovered, Mark Albers and his friends (collectively, “Albers”) in a rented houseboat floating on Lake Powell, Arizona. Suspecting Albers was BASE jumping 1 in a national recreation area, a federal crime, the rangers searched the houseboat. During the search they seized videotapes and undeveloped film as well as parachutes, helmets and other equipment. Albers was arrested and charged with violating 36 C.F.R. §§ 2.17 (a)(3) and 2.34(a)(4). He moved to suppress the evidence seized by the rangers; the district court granted the motion as to the videotapes and film, reasoning that the rangers should have examined them at the time and place of the search, rather than taking them away and viewing them several days later. In this interlocutory appeal, the government argues that the film and videotapes fall within the closed container rule of United States v. Johns, 469 U.S. 478 , 105 S.Ct. 881 , 83 L.Ed.2d 890 (1985). Because we may affirm on any basis supported by the record, Rosenbaum v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 104 F.3d 258, 261 (9th Cir.1996), Albers challenges the search and seizure on other grounds as well.

Albers claims that the entire houseboat…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.